E-cigarettes are a nicotine delivery system to the lungs
that doesn’t involve the carcinogenic byproducts of burning tobacco leaves. Rather,
a liquid nicotine solution is vaporized into steam that is inhaled. There has
been no association to date of e-cigs with cancer, but that doesn’t mean that
they are a good idea.
As a replacement for regular cigarettes, e-cigs might be a
public health win by reducing lung cancer but the risk of cardiovascular
disease would remain. Nicotine constricts blood vessels, increasing blood
pressure and reducing delivery of oxygen-rich blood. Unlike conventional
cigarettes, there is no learning to inhale or initial coughing bouts leading to concern that
e-cigs might be the gateway to other tobacco use, especially for teens. E-cigs
are so easy to use that one reviewer said that she could smoke them while on
the treadmill.
E-cigs come in a variety of ‘flavors’ and different
concentrations of nicotine. Nicotine is known to improve mood and many find it
an effective appetite suppressant. There is a small amount of contested evidence
that it might delay the start of Alzheimer’s disease – not a reason to start using nicotine in any form.
Another danger of e-cigs is that it might become socially
acceptable to use them indoors, exposing others to the nicotine-laced steam.
New York City, among other places, limits the use of e-cigs the same way as
conventional cigarettes including the proscription against use in outdoor
public places.
Both tobacco companies and pharmaceutical companies have
financial interests in e-cigs, but the final say lies with both regulators and
the users. If society thinks that smoking is a bad idea the type of nicotine delivery
won’t matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment